The Reluctant Mac User #2: First Impressions

So, I’ve been given a company Macbook Pro as my new office computer – as a longtime user of anything but a Mac, there’s a slow process of getting used to it – which I’m documenting here. I’m trying to stick to using the mac in general rather than specific implementations of applications by work, or the associated policies and procedures. I’ve been using this Mac for about 2 weeks now – and thought it was about time for another update on what I love, hate, tolerate, etc. so far.

So, in no particular order…

The Screen

Is fantastically sharp: it’s really nice for looking at photos, and documents, websites etc, all appear that bit crisper than they seem to on a PC. One slight drawback to this is the shinyness, it does ‘glare’ a lot from windows and flourescent lights which can cause issues with viewing the screen (and getting the brightness right so you can read it over the glare, but it isn’t so bright it hurts your eyes is difficult).

It’s also too small – but that’s probably because it’s the 13″ version.

Applications

iWork

This seems basically quite good, it’s intuitive and uncluttered – but basically powerful. Keynote and Numbers particularly seem clever (on a part with office 2007 – which is the last MS Office version I’ve used in anger), Numbers has some particularly nifty features which make organising data a lot neater than Excel – although quite a lot of formulae don’t seem to work quite the same in Numbers – which I guess would be one to watch for acountanty types etc.)

Mail

This is pretty rubbish – going from Outlook to Mail on Mac is a bit like going back to outlook express. It has threaded email which is quite nice (although I believe this is an option in Outlook 2010) – but it’s exchange integration isn’t all that, and it does seem to not be very standards compliant, meaning emails from it can be a touch mangled on other clients (gmail/outlook for example)

VMWare Fusion

This is a pretty smart little app – and means I can still make use of the long list of stuff I use that just doesn’t work natively on Mac, Unity is a nice mode (although seems to batter processing/RAM) which allows use of windows applications from the VM to appear alongside mac applications – making it at least appear as if the windows apps are running on the Mac

Keyboard

Major major bugbear of mine is the non British Standard keyboard – I am a halfarsed touch typist, and once used to a keyboard can make a reasonable stab at typing without looking down all the time, out of the box the mac ruins this by putting a whole bunch of keys in the wrong place. For example ” is over with ‘, not on the 2 as it has been for the entire of my keyboard using life (which goes back to a typewriter), this is really annoying as you start to write emails to people with email addresses like annoyedwith”mac.com – and then swearing at the mac a lot when it doesn’t send.

Hardcore Mac converts like to go ” makes more sense with ‘ – which maybe it does, but unfortunately the BS 101 key keyboard has been around for a very long time and like riding a bike once you can use it properly adapting to a different layout is a steep uphill curve. Offering a British Standard keyboard as an option rather than just turning around and saying ‘get used to it’ would have been a far better attitude from Apple IMO.

It should be said that it is possible to download keymaps (as I have) to put everything back as it should be – and also making my computer very confusing for an uninitiated user as a whole load of keys don’t do what they say on them – it’s just a shame it’s not like this from the off.

The Operating System

Is fine – I find the menu bar which floats outside the app a bit confusing, but that’s just the conversion from Windows/KDE to a different layout and I’m sure it will become native in time. It’s basically a unixy interface, and it more or less intuitive.

Multiple desktops are a definite highlight and I like the way it handles fullscreen apps (effectively allowing you to have multiple and being able to flick between them like with the desktops).

Restoring Windows States

This is extremely irritating, natively the previous window used in an app is reloaded when you restart the app – this seems to me very wasteful as the computer is chugging away loading a document I’m about to close anyway as I didn’t want to read that one. Also the mac prompts me everytime I log out if I want to restore ALL my windows when I log back in. Of course I don’t – anything I want next time I’m more than capable of opening on my own without the computer loading all kinds of other stuff for me. It seems it’s not possible to have this off by default (grrr….!)

Gestures

Initially baffling I’m warming to the ‘trackpad works a bit like a touchscreen’ thing – I found myself using a windows laptop and trying to scroll with 2 fingers on the pad the other day for example. – I don’t use the trackpad a huge amount on laptops normally as I find an external mouse does the job so much better – but for use on trains etc (only time I really use trackpads anyway) – it should make the job easier.

In general I’m still climbing a hill with the mac – there’s a load of stuff to get used to, but I’ve managed to bend the machine to my will a bit, and I’ve also managed to get used to a fair few of it’s foibles – the pros roughly balance the cons – making it exactly on a par with windows in my book. I think the key thing is it is just a laptop: it does the stuff a laptop does, some well – some badly, I’ve not joined the cult, I have no intention of entering a mac store, and I still think Steve Jobs is a bad man……

 

will that change, will I end up loving or hating this piece of Aluminium – find out in the next thrilling installment.

The Reluctant Mac User #1: Preconceptions

 

Apple

 

So, I am entering a brave new world – my company in its infinite wisdom has decided that it’s time to wave goodbye to good old dependable Dell & Windows and say hello to racier shinier Apple. As a technical type person within the company I’ve found myself being part of the pilot phase (Alpha testing, call it what you will….) – on the way back to sunny Hampshire having received my Macbook it occurred to me that it might be a useful activity (for me as much as you, although good to have you along…!) to record my thoughts/feelings/opinions/experiences. I intend to be entirely honest, as such if use a piece of software or whatever and think that’s great, I shall record it here. If I find myself thinking “I could do this better with Windows/Ubuntu”, then I’ll be jotting that down too.

Firstly (for anyone who’s stumbled across this blog by accident and doesn’t actually know me – a little bit of a background on me):

  • I have quite literally been brought up with PCs – and in some ways, was an early adopter – when Windows was at the cutting edge. I had windows 2.0 the first PC I had to myself (an old IBM AT) – and I moved through 3.1, 3.11 before being early to take the big leap to the strange new world of windows 95 with its fantastic new interface.
  • I’ve not only used windows, I’m above average on command line Linux, and have tinkered about with Ubuntu’s GUIs (KDE and Gnome flavours, and the new unity) – I’ve used Unix occasionally on Sun and Silicon graphics machines (going back a few years) and my fist computing experiences were in the murky world of acorn and BBC, so I’ve not always done things Bill Gates’ way by any means
  • My home desktop PC has ALWAYS been Windows
  • I have always used Windows in the workplace (unless you count the odd Redhat Web/File Server and some ubuntu boxes for playing with)
  • I am a “power user” – I have in the past looked after active directory infrastructure, software distribution etc. I’m the one that tells you to turn it off and on again, not the one who’s calling up support.
  • I’m a fiddler – I’ll mess about with a computer until it does what I want it to, and can take several weeks to give up and ask someone else’s advice (although I will google things)
  • I have an iPad (also works) – so am not totally unfamiliar with Apple kit.
  • I have certain preconceptions about Mac Hardware/Software and most importantly the sort of people who’d use these devices – which will be the subject of this blog.

So, here we go with my preconceptions (I’m not saying there’s any factual basis in the following – but it’s always been the impressions I’ve had) before I enter the brave new mac world.

Macs are for arty types

You know what I mean; graphic designers, music producers, web designers. They’re machines for the people who make arty stuff, and as such the applications they have for doing this (photoshop, protools etc.) are great on a mac and do the job they do really well. Macs don’t really sit with an accountant or an office it guy – these people belong in the corner typing into MS word on a dull grey box, it’s just the natural order of things.

Macs are style over substance

Even I with my general stubbornness, and complete lack of anything that could be called ‘style’ can’t pretend for a second that the MacBook isn’t pretty. It’s a really nice piece of hardware, which just feels well-built and solid – but that’s next to useless if the software inside the box isn’t up to much, at the end of the day an office PC needs to be functional not pretty – and I’m assessing the usefulness of the Mac in replacing my HP in the office, not the PC at home I use for listening to music/watching videos.

I see having a mic/iPhone/iTouch as being a brand statement, something the cool kids do – and I’ve never been one of the cool kids – and I’ve never been an uber geek. I view having a mac like having to have the right brand of car/trousers/jeans etc… and that’s not just me. I dress comfortably and drive what I’m given – ultimately I’ve never been one to fall into line with any stereotypes, and I don’t intend to now, but I guess we’ll see…

Macs are overpriced

Not really my problem in this case, as the machine is provided by my employer, but given this machine retail price would cost in the region of twice an equivalent spec Dell – I’d really hope it could perform in a way which would justify this (both the hardware & software)

Mac users are a cult

I have no allegiance to Microsoft or Linux in any way, both have pros and cons – and I often flip between the two depending on which is best placed for the task I’m doing. I generally code in Ubuntu – I use windows for media consumption as I’m totally happy with the software environment I use for this. Now I have a mac at my disposal I totally expect it will usurp on of the other platforms for some tasks as I naturally expect it to outperform the other platforms for some applications (see previous point). However mac users aren’t like you and me (unless you are one) – they’re Obsessed, their mac can do no wrong in their eyes – and can perform every application under the sun better than any other computer ever formed, and as soon as a new one comes out you bet they’ll be opening their wallets up and letting Mr Jobs in, “What Mr Farrington – your home PC is 7 years old – ha ha, how can you live with such a dinosaur” – they’ll ask, surely you wanted to buy a new and slightly shinier one a year later because someone told you to. Well actually no, it still does everything I need it to without causing me any frustrations – why would I replace it. I regularly voice my irritation with (particularly) Windows, but also Linux when I can’t do exactly what I want to out of the box, you’ll never hear this from a mac user – if it doesn’t do what they want it to, it must be them that’s in the wrong.

I’ve regularly got into arguments with a couple of quite vocal mac users keen to defend their shiny pieces of metal when I’ve said “but does it do this, can it do this” and start going on about me “being a PC” (I’m not I’m a person) etc…. and being some kind of dinosaur for daring to suggest that the millions of PC users probably aren’t wrong.

Apple are an evil corporation

Microsoft get a lot of stick, and a lot of it is justified for being an evil corporation – but more or less from day 1 Mr Gates and co haven’t prescribed what hardware is required to run their software, nor have they attempted to control what software can be run on their platform in any way, and yes I understand that this leads to some of Windows’ traditional instabilities and leaves it open in some respects to viruses and the like – however it also means that there’s an open market in both hardware and software (yes folks, that’s why PCs are cheaper, as there’s real competition between vendors) the attitude of Apple has always struck me as the opposite of this – I’m always amused when Mac types start going on about “evil microsoft” – as at the end of the day Apple isn’t run by Ben & Jerry’s hippies meditating on bean bags, it’s run by people every bit as ruthless as those on the other side of the silicon fence. If you want socks and sandals – run Linux!

As I’ve said these are just my preconceptions if you’d asked me in 2008 what I thought of macs I’d say all of the above. When I first suggested writing this all up as a blog on the twitter one very vocal mac type I’ve many times baited argued with on the subject, suggested I’d be writing a blog entirely eating my own words. Well above are my own words, and in many way I hope to be eating them over the coming months. I don’t believe I’ll be completely renouncing the PC, and saving up to replace my old dependable Win 7 machine with a shiny box any time soon, the future is multiplatform and I’ll be running windows, linux and the company mac for a good while to come – but who knows, anything can happen!

I plan to do this more or less weekly updating you (and as such me) with the little niggles, and any big issues I come across – who knows you might even be able to give me some tips to help me get along with the new challenge.

I’m set in my ways, and out of my comfort zone – but I managed to write all of this on the Mac without combusting so who knows – I may be just fine.

Apprentice Episode 1: “If my team loses i’ll blame the project manager, if i’m the project manager – i’ll blame someone else”

So, there it goes the first episode of the apprentice 2011 the fairly standard here’s some money and a market, make me a profit task. As usual the candidates look like a proper mixed bag with a fair few er…. personalities, here’s a quick round up of my first impressions (warning if you haven’t seen it – look away now).

So:

Edna: wow – is she going to rub someone up the wrong way quickly,  someone really early on said something she didn’t like and she looked like she was about to blow, not to mention the fact she was blatantly making up excuses for things all the way through the episode (she’s my ‘to hate’ candidate so far this year.

Melody: Another errr… strong personality but seems to have some effectiveness along with it there might be a bit of potential here, and after all her plan won!

Jim Eastwood & Gavin Winstanley: both seem like pretty straight guys, and basically competent – actually found myself more or less liking both of these two by the end.

Ellie: There’s definite comedy value here, with the not knowing how to spell vegetable, and the brilliant comment along the lines of “I wouldn’t eat it, but who knows I haven’t been in London that long” or whatever it was, recon she might bethe Baggs of this series, on value alone.

Edward: What an idiot, managed to be both a bad project manager, a useless accountant, and basically a tit – so no surprises for me when he got fired – especially when he took a couple of the more benign members of the team into the boardroom. What a muppet.

As for the others (including Felicity, who I’m backing) er, didn’t see much of you. Any chance you could sort of do something (or at least near a camera), then we might have an idea of who’ll win.

Quote of the week has to be “I’m the youngest, I’m also the shortest” – best way to attempt not to get fired ever, shame it didn’t work.

On This Whole Referendum Thing #yes2av #no2av

Ballot Box

Ballot Box

I’ve always made it my policy not to tell people which way I’m going to vote on something (or which way I’ve voted for that matter) as I’m a big fan of not allowing myself to influence other people’s political decisions. I’m going to attempt to examine some of the arguments for tomorrow’s referendum without obviously supporting either camp – I will probably fail as will doubtless become apparent.

Incidentally if you didn’t know there is a referendum tomorrow this probably isn’t the post for you.

So I’ll examine what appear to be the main points being made by both sides based these websites (yes/no) – my basic premise in this analysis is that change is basically a good thing unless there are convincing arguements against it. So here we go….

No to AV

  • AV is Costly
    • Apparently AV will cost £250 million, and involve expensive machinery and campaigns. I guess I can see the machinery argument, although it’s totally possible to count votes under AV using piles of ballot papers (I’ve done it) it might become complicated on a constituency scale. As for voter education, “Rank your candidates in order of preference” – there you go, I’ve done it (if anyone wants to pay me £100 million or whatever for this I’m more than happy for you to do this!)
  • AV is Complex and Unfair
    • Complex? Really? it works in Student Union elections at Bath – and given the number of sports monkeys involved, this probably means rowers can understand it (I’m being deliberately provocative here, but the basics can be explained on a side of A4 so it really isn’t that hard).
    • Unfair? Well that depends on your analogy, if you compare it with a running race then yes it could be construed as unfair as the first person who crosses the line isn’t necessarily the one who gets the gold medal – but it isn’t a race at the end of the day it’s about representation – if the majority of people have been represented in the result (this isn’t always the case under First Past the Post) then it is fair. AV isn’t perfect but it means more votes count towards the end result.
  • AV is a Politicians Fix
    • Well, errr…. so basically this is the “Nick Clegg is a nasty man” point, fundamentally I don’t believe Coalitions are bad things, or Liberal Democrats for that matter and as such I believe this point is just trying to say “Don’t like the coalition and what they’re doing, don’t vote yes”, frankly I think this argument is missing the point, this is a referendum on the future not the present so really this is an attempt to mislead people on what they’re voting on. It’s not a vote of confidence in the coalition, it’s a referendum on the voting system.

Yes to AV

  • It makes MP’s work harder
    • So MP’s have to appeal to more than 50% of the electorate – I guess this has pro’s and con’s, it’ll temper some of the harder right/left elements in the middle of the road parties (strong lines on immigration, or nationalisation or whatever), but in turn it also has the potential to decrease the differential between the main parties with them all competing for the middle ground (and it’s already bad enough). I guess this depends on your views, personally I think there needs to be more difference between the main parties than tie colour, but I also don’t find myself agreeing with the more extreme policies of any of the major parties.
  • It gives the Voter a bigger say
    • Well this essentially has to be good doesn’t it (you could argue that sometimes the voter doesn’t know what’s good for them – but if so you don’t really believe in democracy, otherwise I find this a hard point to argue against). If you don’t get your favorite, there’s a good chance you’ll get your second choice – this seems a good idea. If I can’t get a Yorkie from the vending machine, I’d rather have a twix than a bloody topic.
  • It tackles the ‘Jobs for life’ Culture
    • Well, I guess safe seats can be blamed for a lot of voter apathy – after all why vote if you know candidate X will get in anyway. There’s not an easy argument against this, as the power rests with the electorate anyway, if they want to remove an MP they can by putting them as last choice, if not they can vote for them again (although I guess this is also true with FPTP, but it’s a lot easier to make this happen with AV).

So in summary, as I said at the beginning I’ll decide based on who makes the best arguments (it’s not impossible to work out who I think that is from the above) – but I’ll definitely be voting having made my decision, and whatever you think – I urge you to vote too.

For the record (as a preemptive attack on any provocative comments from either side of the debate):

Politically I describe myself as a ‘liberal conservative who knows his own mind and doesn’t totally align with any specific parties ideology. I think broadly the coalition is doing a reasonable job (although I don’t agree with all their policies, for example I love libraries and believe they have an important place in the modern world) and I think it’s really important to give the public a say directly on major issues such as this. This was also a quick post, so isn’t super-thorough either in writing or research, I don’t think I’ve quoted any facts, but if I have and they’re inaccurate I apologise.

It’s Back… (The Apprentice 2011) #bbcapprentice

So anyone who knows me well will know I’m a bit of a fan of The Apprentice (ok… a borderline obsessive) – I’ve been watching the program since towards the end of the first series. I’ve been pretty much been hooked by the bizarre entertainment offered by a load of people who are supposedly business professionals proving that actually they mostly haven’t a bloody clue since the very beginning. The new series starts on May 10th on BBC1 at 9pm, and will give me something to do on Wednesday nights for a couple of months! The candidates for this series were announced today – and look like the usual mixed bunch of people with more confidence than discernible talent.

Since the 3rd series I and a few of my friends have ‘backed a candidate’ each based on their photo (and nothing else) – as there’s only 4 of us and we’ve picked ours I thought I’d open the rest up to blog reading types! There’s no prize or anything, but it makes the program more fun as we get a bit competitive (I backed Stella last year who went on to win – and am hoping to repeat my feat this year).

The candidates list as follows:

The Candidates

  • Leon Doyle
  • Alex Britez Cabral
  • Melody Hossaini
  • Felicity Jackson (taken by me!)
  • Edna Agbarha
  • Susan Ma (taken by @robjstyles)
  • Ellie Reed (taken by @RobFarrington)
  • Helen Louise Milligan (@AdamJTaylor)
  • Natasha Scribbins
  • Vincent Disneur
  • Jim Eastwood (taken by @WibbLarque)
  • Edward Hunter
  • Gavin Winstanley (taken by @Kate_Harrington)
  • Tom Pellereau (taken by @MissWimsett)
  • Glenn Ward (taken by @D_C_W)
  • Zoe Beresford (@thewelshbrummie)

Have a look at the candidates and make your choice on The Spy.

If you fancy backing one of the others (beware this exposes you to ridicule if your candidate does something particularly stupid during the show) stick a comment below with your choice and twitter ID!

As ever I’ll be tweeting/blogging along to the series (I’ll try not to get too carried away this year… but no promises!)

Return top

Mark Farrington

Mark Farrington
Broadcast Engineer working in UK Commercial Radio, former Student Radio person (and Honorary Lifetime Member of the Student Radio Association) - I also play with bits and pieces of web stuff, cycle, take photos, cook food and enjoy a good pint of real ale.